The Moral Magic of Consent

Legal Theory 2 (3):165-174 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I begin my analysis of consent by agreeing with Professor Hurd that consent functions as a “moral transformative” by altering the obligations and permissions that determine the Tightness of others' actions. I further agree with her that consent is intimately related to the capacity for autonomous action; one who cannot alter others' obligations through consent is not fully autonomous. I cannot improve on her elaboration of these points.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
333 (#88,419)

6 months
33 (#115,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Wronging Oneself.Daniel Muñoz & Nathaniel Baron-Schmitt - 2024 - Journal of Philosophy 121 (4):181-207.
Moral Risk and Communicating Consent.Renée Bolinger - 2019 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 47 (2):179-207.
Understanding, Communication, and Consent.Joseph Millum & Danielle Bromwich - 2018 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 5:45-68.
Informed Consent Under Ignorance.Daniel Villiger - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-13.

View all 37 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Moral Magic of Consent.Heidi Hurd - 1996 - Legal Theory 2 (2):121-146.

Add more references