Questioning Bioethics AIDS, Sexual Ethics, and the Duty to Warn

Hastings Center Report 29 (5):26-35 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bioethicists have virtually assumed that Tarasoff generated a duty to warn the sexual partners of an HIV‐positive man that they risked infection. Yet given the views of sex and of AIDS that have evolved in the gay community, in many cases the parallels to Tarasoff do not hold. Bioethicists should at the least attend to the community's views, and indeed should go beyond doing mere “professional ethics” to participate in the moral self‐exploration in which these views are located.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Tarasoff rule: the implications of interstate variation and gaps in professional training.Rebecca Johnson, Govind Persad & Dominic Sisti - 2014 - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 42 (4):469-477.
Confidentiality and duty to warn the third parties in HIV/AIDS context.A. Sirinskiene, J. Juskevicius & A. Naberkovas - 2005 - Medicínska Etika a Bioetika: Časopis Ústavu Medicínskej Etiky a Bioetiky= Medical Ethics and Bioethics 12 (1).
Dementia and Concurrent Consent to Sexual Relations.Samuel Director - 2023 - Hastings Center Report 53 (3):37-45.
Aids: Crisis in Professional Ethics.Elliot D. Cohen - 1994 - Temple University Press.
AIDS and Sex: Is Warning a Moral Obligation?Donald C. Ainslie - 2002 - Health Care Analysis 10 (1):49-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
38 (#596,272)

6 months
5 (#1,053,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald Ainslie
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references