The Natural Philosopher and the Microscope: Nicolas Hartsoeker Unravels Nature's “Admirable Œconomy”

History of Science 51 (1):1-32 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The coherence of cohesion in the later Leibniz.Peter R. Anstey - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4):594-613.
Catherine Wilson's the invisible world: Early modern philosophy and the invention of the microscope.Brian S. Baigrie - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (2):165 – 174.
Catherine Kendig, ed. Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice. London: Routledge, 2016. Pp. xx+247. $153.00.Max Dresow & Alan C. Love - 2018 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8 (1):217-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-12

Downloads
43 (#520,375)

6 months
8 (#591,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Observation in the margins, 500-1500.Katharine Park - 2011 - In Lorraine Daston & Elizabeth Lunbeck (eds.), Histories of scientific observation. London: University of Chicago Press.
Descartes and the method of English science.G. A. J. Rogers - 1972 - Annals of Science 29 (3):237-255.
Descartes and the method of English science.G. A. J. Rogers PhD - 1972 - Annals of Science 29 (3):237-255.
Ars tornandi: Baroque architecture and the Lathe.Joseph Connors - 1990 - Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 53 (1):217-236.

View all 7 references / Add more references