Results for 'visual reaction time response'

986 found
Order:
  1.  96
    Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response.Joseph S. Lappin & Charles W. Eriksen - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (6):805.
  2.  39
    (1 other version)Age-related slowing of response selection and production in a visual choice reaction time task.David L. Woods, John M. Wyma, E. William Yund, Timothy J. Herron & Bruce Reed - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  3.  34
    A comparison of choreic with normal children on the basis of simple reaction times to visual and auditory stimuli.D. A. Bradshaw - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (2):184.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  35
    The Victorians were still faster than us. Commentary: Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time.Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie, Jan te Nijenhuis & Raegan Murphy - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9:150650.
    Woods et al. (2015) claim that secular Simple Reaction Time (SRT) slowing (Woodley et al. 2013), disappears once modern studies are corrected for software and hardware lag, and once Galton’s data are corrected for fastest-response selection. Here, this is challenged with a reanalysis of the secular slowing of SRT in the UK amongst large (N>500), population-representative age-matched (≊18-30 years) studies. Starting with Galton’s sample, this is assigned the simulated value estimated by Dodonova and Dodonov (2013, who like (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  40
    Responding to emotional scenes: effects of response outcome and picture repetition on reaction times and the late positive potential.Nina N. Thigpen, Andreas Keil & Alexandra M. Freund - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (1):1-13.
    Processing the motivational relevance of a visual scene and reacting accordingly is crucial for survival. Previous work suggests the emotional content of naturalistic scenes affects response speed, such that unpleasant content slows responses whereas pleasant content accelerates responses. It is unclear whether these effects reflect motor-cognitive processes, such as attentional orienting, or vary with the function/outcome of the motor response itself. Four experiments manipulated participants’ ability to terminate the picture and, thereby, the response’s function and motivational (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  20
    Remote action potentials at the moment of response in a simple reaction-time situation.Robert L. Henderson - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (4):238.
  7.  34
    A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory.Anthony G. Greenwald - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):20.
  8.  31
    Visual reaction time and the Broca-Sulzer phenomenon.David Raab, Elizabeth Fehrer & Maurice Hershenson - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (3):193.
  9.  35
    Visual reaction time and the human alpha rhythm: The effects of stimulus luminance, area, and duration.Daniel N. Robinson - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):16.
  10.  21
    Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults.Charlotte J. Codina, Olivier Pascalis, Heidi A. Baseler, Alexandra T. Levine & David Buckley - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
  11.  30
    Verbal and motor responses to seven symbolic visual codes: A study in S-R compatibility.Earl A. Alluisi & Paul F. Muller Jr - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):247.
  12. The timing of brain events: Authors’ response to Libet’s ‘Reply’.David A. Oakley & Patrick Haggard - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (3):548-550.
  13.  20
    Laws of the simple visual reaction time.Warren H. Teichner & Marjorie J. Krebs - 1972 - Psychological Review 79 (4):344-358.
  14.  27
    Understanding visual attention with RAGNAROC: A reflexive attention gradient through neural AttRactOr competition.Brad Wyble, Chloe Callahan-Flintoft, Hui Chen, Toma Marinov, Aakash Sarkar & Howard Bowman - 2020 - Psychological Review 127 (6):1163-1198.
    A quintessential challenge for any perceptual system is the need to focus on task-relevant information without being blindsided by unexpected, yet important information. The human visual system incorporates several solutions to this challenge, one of which is a reflexive covert attention system that is rapidly responsive to both the physical salience and the task-relevance of new information. This paper presents a model that simulates behavioral and neural correlates of reflexive attention as the product of brief neural attractor states that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  56
    Decision conflict drives reaction times and utilitarian responses in sacrificial dilemmas.Alejandro Rosas, Juan Pablo Bermúdez & David Aguilar-Pardo - 2019 - Judgment and Decision Making 14:555-564.
    In the sacrificial moral dilemma task, participants have to morally judge an action that saves several lives at the cost of killing one person. According to the dual process corrective model of moral judgment suggested by Greene and collaborators (2001; 2004; 2008), cognitive control is necessary to override the intuitive, deontological force of the norm against killing and endorse the utilitarian perspective. However, a conflict model has been proposed more recently to account for part of the evidence in favor of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16.  48
    Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time.Ira H. Bernstein, Mark H. Clark & Barry A. Edelstein - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):567.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  28
    Implicit visual learning and the expression of learning.Hilde Haider, Katharina Eberhardt, Alexander Kunde & Michael Rose - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (1):82-98.
    Although the existence of implicit motor learning is now widely accepted, the findings concerning perceptual implicit learning are ambiguous. Some researchers have observed perceptual learning whereas other authors have not. The review of the literature provides different reasons to explain this ambiguous picture, such as differences in the underlying learning processes, selective attention, or differences in the difficulty to express this knowledge. In three experiments, we investigated implicit visual learning within the original serial reaction time task. We (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  18.  34
    Supplementary report: The effect of stimulus duration and luminance on visual reaction time.David Raab & Elizabeth Fehrer - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):326.
  19.  42
    Comparison of the effect of auditory versus visual stimulation on information capacity of discrete motor responses.W. W. Breen, M. J. De Haemer & G. K. Poock - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):395.
  20.  18
    Effects of three-dimension movie visual fatigue on cognitive performance and brain activity.Ryota Akagi, Hiroki Sato, Tatsuya Hirayama, Kosuke Hirata, Masahiro Kokubu & Soichi Ando - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16:974406.
    To further develop three-dimensional (3D) applications, it is important to elucidate the negative effects of 3D applications on the human body and mind. Thus, this study investigated differences in the effects of visual fatigue on cognition and brain activity using visual and auditory tasks induced by watching a 1-h movie in two dimensions (2D) and 3D. Eighteen young men participated in this study. Two conditions were randomly performed for each participant on different days, namely, watching the 1-h movie (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  37
    The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on High-Precision Measures of Simple Visual Reaction Time.David L. Woods, John M. Wyma, E. William Yund & Timothy J. Herron - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  22.  20
    Influence of the Location of a Decision Cue on the Dynamics of Pupillary Light Response.Pragya Pandey & Supriya Ray - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15.
    The pupils of the eyes reflexively constrict in light and dilate in dark to optimize retinal illumination. Non-visual cognitive factors, like attention, arousal, decision-making, etc., also influence pupillary light response. During passive viewing, the eccentricity of a stimulus modulates the pupillary aperture size driven by spatially weighted corneal flux density, which is the product of luminance and the area of the stimulus. Whether the scope of attention also influences PLR remains unclear. In this study, we contrasted the pupil (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  28
    Associative reaction time and meaningfulness of CVCVC response terms in paired-associate learning.Ronald Ley & David Locascio - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (3p1):445.
  24.  39
    Differential response patterns to disgust-related pictures.Jakob Fink, Frederike Buchta & Cornelia Exner - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (8):1678-1690.
    ABSTRACTIn the present study, attentional bias was investigated as a potential predisposing mechanism for the contamination-related subtype of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Fifty healthy participants with varying degrees of subclinical C-OC symptoms performed a visual search task to measure differential attentional biases elicited by neutral, disgust-, and fear-specific pictorial material. Participants had to find a target picture within five neutral distractor pictures randomly presented on different locations in an array. The task was to decide whether the array contained an unpleasant target (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25.  37
    Reaction time as a function of perceptual bias, response bias, and stimulus discriminability.Howard B. Orenstein - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):38.
  26.  23
    Associative reaction time of response terms in paired-associate learning.Ronald Ley & Leonora Anderson - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):378.
  27.  23
    Conscious contributions to subliminal priming.Piotr Jaśkowski - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):72-83.
    Choice reaction times to visual stimuli may be influenced by preceding subliminal stimuli . Some authors reported a straight priming effect i.e., responses were faster when primes and targets called for the same response than when they called for different responses. Others found the reversed pattern of results. Eimer and Schlaghecken [Eimer, M. & Schlaghecken, F. . Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514–520.] showed recently that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28.  28
    Reaction time indices of automatic imitation measure imitative response tendencies.Emiel Cracco & Marcel Brass - 2019 - Consciousness and Cognition 68 (C):115-118.
  29.  26
    Information and reaction time for "naming" responses.Robert E. Morin, Andrew Konick & Sandra McPherson - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (3):309.
  30.  24
    Response equivocation and reaction time.Robert E. Morin & Bert Forrin - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (1):30.
  31.  23
    Event-Related Potential Assessment of Visual Perception Abnormality in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Preliminary Study.Chao Yang, Changming Wang, Xuanyu Chen, Bing Xiao, Na Fu, Bo Ren & Yi Liu - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16.
    This study investigated the effect of obstructive sleep apnea on the neural mechanism of visual perception. A preliminary case-control study was conducted. Seventeen patients with moderate to severe OSA in the sleep center of Civil Aviation General Hospital and 20 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and education were recruited. The participants accepted the perceptual contour integration task, compared the differences in behavioral indicators between the two groups, and compared the differences in electroencephalography data between the two groups through (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  18
    Reaction time under stimulus uncertainty with response certainty.Paul J. Barber & Simon Folkard - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):138.
  33.  26
    Laws of visual choice reaction time.Warren H. Teichner & Marjorie J. Krebs - 1974 - Psychological Review 81 (1):75-98.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  34.  22
    Effects of primary and secondary aversive motivation on finger-withdrawl reaction time responses.Donald J. Levis & Robert G. Warehime - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):126.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  19
    Reaction time and visual area: Searching for the determinants.Claude Bonnet, Jorge Gurlekian & Paula Harris - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (5):396-398.
  36.  23
    The effect of certain variables on visual and auditory reaction times.G. Forbes - 1945 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (2):153.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  30
    Same-different reaction time to the sequential visual presentation of vowels and consonants.Kimberly D. Peterson, J. Richard Simon & Jyh-Hone Wang - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (4):248-250.
  38.  35
    Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.J. Richard Simon, James V. Hinrichs & John L. Craft - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):97.
  39. Reaction-time and response dynamics.Km Newell & Lg Carlton - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):327-327.
  40.  35
    Reaction time under three viewing conditions: Binocular, dominant eye, and nondominant eye.Patricia Kelsey Minucci & Mary M. Connors - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (3):268.
  41.  29
    Are there right hemisphere contributions to visually-guided movement? Manipulating left hand reaction time advantages in dextrals.David P. Carey, E. Grace Otto-de Haart, Gavin Buckingham, H. Chris Dijkerman, Eric L. Hargreaves & Melvyn A. Goodale - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6:132445.
    Many studies have argued for distinct but complementary contributions from each hemisphere in the control of movements to visual targets. Investigators have attempted to extend observations from patients with unilateral left- and right-hemisphere damage, to those using neurologically-intact participants, by assuming that each hand has privileged access to the contralateral hemisphere. Previous attempts to illustrate right hemispheric contributions to the control of aiming have focussed on increasing the spatial demands of an aiming task, to attenuate the typical right hand (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  42.  22
    Reaction time and EEG activation under alerted and nonalerted conditions.Robert W. Lansing, Edward Schwartz & Donald B. Lindsley - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):1.
  43.  87
    How reaction time measures elucidate the matching bias and the way negations are processed.Jérôme Prado & Ira A. Noveck - 2006 - Thinking and Reasoning 12 (3):309 – 328.
    Matching bias refers to the non-normative performance that occurs when elements mentioned in a rule do not correspond with those in a test item. One aim of the present work is to capture matching bias via reaction times as participants carry out truth-table evaluation tasks. Experiment 1 requires participants to verify conditional rules, and Experiment 2 to falsify them as the paradigm employs four types of conditional sentences that systematically rotate negatives in the antecedent and consequent; and presents predominantly (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  44.  67
    The great subjective back-referral debate: Do neural responses increase during a train of stimuli?Susan Pockett - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (3):551-559.
    Evidence is summarised for and against the hypothesis that potentiation or facilitation of neural responses during a train of threshold-level stimuli occurred in the experiments reported by Libet et al. . It is concluded that such potentiation probably did occur. Since the main arguments for the existence of subjective backwards referral take it as given that such potentiation did not occur, it is further concluded that the main arguments for the existence of subjective backwards referral fail.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  41
    Prediction outcome and choice reaction time: Stimulus versus response anticipation.Charles P. Whitman & E. Scott Geller - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):193.
  46. Response priming with and without awareness.Jens Schwarzbach & Dirk Vorberg - 2006 - In Haluk O. Gmen & Bruno G. Breitmeyer (eds.), The First Half Second: The Microgenesis and Temporal Dynamics of Unconscious and Conscious Visual Processes. MIT Press. pp. 297-314.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  23
    Effects of the intensity of auditory and visual ready signals on simple reaction time.David L. Kohfeld - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (1p1):88.
  48.  17
    Refractoriness in the reaction times of normals and retardates as a function of response-stimulus interval.Alfred A. Baumeister & George A. Kellas - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):122.
  49.  25
    Sequential effects in choice reaction time.Roger W. Schvaneveldt & William G. Chase - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):1.
  50.  24
    Expectancy in choice reaction time: Anticipation of stimulus or response?James V. Hinrichs & Patricia L. Krainz - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (3):330.
1 — 50 / 986