Our linguistic communication is, in part, the exchange of truths. It is an empirical fact that in daily conversation we aim at truths, not falsehoods. This fact may lead us to assume that ordinary, assertion-based communication is the only possible communicative system for truth-apt information exchange, or at least has priority over any alternatives. This assumption is underwritten in three traditional doctrines: that assertion is a basic notion, in terms of which we define denial; that to predicate truth of a (...) sentence is to assert the content it expresses; and that one should, in the context of radical interpretation, try to maximize the truth of what foreigners believe or utter. However, I challenge this assumption via a thought experiment: imagine a language game in which everyone aims to exchange only falsehoods. I argue that information exchange is possible in this game, and so truth-guided communication and falsity-guided communication are conceptually on a par. As a consequence, we should reject the three doctrines, based as they are on the conceptual priority of assertion-based communication. (shrink)

ABSTRACTIn this article, we provide guidance for the implementation of education for sustainable development in schools. We combine Bhaskar's Transformational Model of Social Activity,...

In 4.062 of the Tractatus, Wittgenstein repudiates the possibility of “mak[ing] ourselves understood with false propositions just as we have done up until now with true ones”. This chapter challenges this claim by distinguishing two possible cases in which people communicate truth-apt information through false propositions. The first case presents a semantic option, where false propositions become true “construed in the new way” while people aim at conveying truths, whereas the second case presents a pragmatic option, where false propositions remain (...) false while people aim at falsehoods. Wittgenstein’s conclusion applies to the semantic, but not to the pragmatic option. The possibility of falsity-directed communication enables us to reconstruct Dummett’s argument from his analogy between truth and winning, which refutes alethic deflationism. Finally, the chapter reconciles the debate. (shrink)

一遍仏教やその周縁と対話し、無・型・身体性などを契機として日本独自の教育の構築を試みたユニークな教育再生論。.

売文業者か、思想家か。ネット・テレビ・活字論壇に登場し、今をときめく「メディア知識人」たち。忘れ去られた思想家清水幾太郎から、彼らの生存戦略そして「業」が見えてくる。.

武內義雄是中國哲學思想研究的重要學者,他以實證論來研究中國思想史的方法,啟發了後來的許多重要學者.武內義雄按古代期(諸子,經學),中古期(三教交涉),近代期(儒教革新)的分類,研究和書寫了中國哲學思想 的源流與演變.既脈絡清晰賅要,又有新的論證角度與獨到見解,讀者可有頗多獲益與啟發.

Life is short and transient--Japanese people call this sentiment mujokan. However, what if we could sweep away the "despair" looming over the present age by proactively accepting this mujo (transience)? Perusing the thought of mujo from the perspectives of philosophy, literature, art and religion, Takeuchi delves into the view of life and death unique to the Japanese people who have shared "grief" and "pain" with each other, as well as into the very core of their underlying spirit." -- Publisher's (...) description. (shrink)

現代人が直面する、安楽死、臓器移植、死刑といった倫理問題に、徳、善、良心、愛を基礎として、読者と共に考えぬく強靱な思索。.

斬新な視点から、やまと言葉の考察を通し、日本語の哲学の可能性を探り、「日本人の心のありか」を指し示す、刮目の書。.

『三太郎の日記』による栄光の後に襲ってきた波乱。同時代の知識人との関係や教育制度から、大正教養派の代表者に迫る社会史的評伝。.