Nonlocality Versus Modified Realism

Foundations of Physics 50 (1):1-26 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A large number of physicists now admit that quantum mechanics is a non-local theory. The EPR argument and the many experiments showing the violation of Bell’s inequalities seem to have confirmed convincingly that quantum mechanics cannot be local. Nevertheless, this conclusion can only be drawn inside a standard realist framework assuming an ontic interpretation of the wave function and viewing the collapse of the wave function as a real change of the physical state of the system. We show that this standpoint is not mandatory and that if the collapse is not considered an actual physical change it is possible to recover locality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,218

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-02

Downloads
110 (#203,715)

6 months
16 (#186,913)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is the Past Determined?Herve Zwirn - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (3):1-28.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Decoherence and Ontology (or: How I learned to stop worrying and love FAPP).David Wallace - 2010 - In Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent & David Wallace, Many Worlds?: Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 53--72.
Relational EPR.Matteo Smerlak & Carlo Rovelli - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (3):427-445.

View all 12 references / Add more references