Comments on Colin Koopman, “Conceptual Analysis for Genealogical Philosophy: How to Study the History of Practices after Foucault and Wittgenstein”

Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (S1):122-125 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary raises a number of questions in connection with Colin Koopman's paper “Conceptual Analysis for Genealogical Philosophy: How to Study the History of Practices after Foucault and Wittgenstein.” Specifically, this commentary asks about the precise relationship between concepts and practices in Koopman's account and the possibility of resisting certain practices of subjectivation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,978

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-15

Downloads
41 (#543,210)

6 months
3 (#1,470,969)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Zubko
University of Memphis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references