Scepticism de se

Erkenntnis 51 (2-3):267-275 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial.Franz Huber, Eric Swanson & Jonathan Weisberg - 2009 - Erkenntnis 70 (2):133-134.
Editorial.Wolfgang Spohn - 1999 - Erkenntnis 50 (1):1-3.
Editorial.Wolfgang Sphon - 1997 - Erkenntnis 46 (1):1-4.
Thanks to the Reviewers of Erkenntnis.[author unknown] - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (1):5-17.
Editorial.Hans Rott - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (1):1-3.
Vorwort.Elke Brendel & Rainer Trapp - 2001 - Erkenntnis 54 (1):3-5.
Editorial.John Earman, Clark Glymour & Sandra Mitchell - 2002 - Erkenntnis 57 (3):277-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#330,036)

6 months
6 (#851,135)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Why will is not a modal.Mikhail Kissine - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (2):129-155.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Attitudes de dicto and de se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
What 'must' and 'can' must and can mean.Angelika Kratzer - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.

Add more references