Historische Erfahrung, kulturelle Sensibilität und Martin Seels Problem mit Thomas Mann

Zeitschrift für Ästhetik Und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 68 (2):54-61 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Martin Seel once made a very derogatory comment on Thomas Mann’s ›Doktor Faustus‹, which can also be called »Nietzsche novel«. I take this as an opportunity to appreciate, in a broader perspective, a thinking born from historical experience and cultural sensitivity in the context of Adorno and Nietzsche. Thomas Mann’s confrontation with the ambivalence of modernity, motivated by National Socialism, points to an unsurpassable intellectual imprint that he shares with Adorno’s experience-bound philosophy. Adorno’s theory of art is aptly corrected by Martin Seel with regard to its aesthetic utopia, but at the same time the affirmative potential of art is vindicated. Following Adorno, art is capable of opening up experiences in its own way that can also provide impulses for politics. This can equally be said about Thomas Mann’s ›Faustus‹.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,253

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Doctor Faustus's Portrait of Theodor Adorno: Instrumentalized Aesthetics and Fascism.John Wells - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (149):69-86.
Thomas Mann's "Doctor Faustus": The Sources and Structure of the Novel.Gunilla Bergsten & Krishna Winston - 1969 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 28 (2):257-257.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-01

Downloads
10 (#1,509,169)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references