Biases and suboptimal choice by animals suggest that framing effects may be ubiquitous

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e246 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Framing effects attributed to “quasi-cyclical” irrational complex human preferences are ubiquitous biases resulting from simpler mechanisms that can be found in other animals. Examples of such framing effects vary from simple learning contexts, to an analog of human gambling behavior, to the value added to a reinforcer by the effort that went into obtaining it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Frames, trade-offs, and perspectives.Ori Weisel & Ro'I. Zultan - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e245.
Why framing effects can be rational.Anton Kühberger - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e231.
Framing provides reasons.Neil Levy - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e233.
Rationality as the end of thought.Nick Chater - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e223.
Framing, equivalence, and rational inference.David R. Mandel - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-26

Downloads
8 (#1,577,253)

6 months
4 (#1,246,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references