How is Dissensus Possible in Consensual Theories? Habermas and Brandom

Abstract

The presentation focuses on the problem of dissensus in Brandom’s and Habermas’ theories of communication and social action. The main questions it raises concern: the concept of dissensus, the main characteristics if it, the possibility of its occurring and indispensable conditions for it. It also claims that Brandom’s account, in opposition to that of Habermas, is more likely to permit rationally based dissensus.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Norms of Legitimate Dissensus.Christian Kock - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (2):179-196.
Dissensus communis : How to keep silent 'after' Lyotard.Rudi Visker - 1995 - In Philippe van Haute & Peg Birmingham (eds.), Dissensus communis: between ethics and politics. Kampen: Kok Pharos.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
18 (#1,108,436)

6 months
5 (#1,035,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tomasz Zarębski
University of Lower Silesia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations