Leibnizian and Nonstandard Analysis: Philosophical Problematization of an Alleged Continuity

Abstract

In the present paper the philosophical and mathematical continuity alleged by A. Robinson in Nonstandard Analysis (1966) between his theory and Leibniz’s calculus is investigated. In Section 1, after a brief overview of the history of analysis, we expose the historical, mathematical and philosophical aspects of Leibniz’s calculus. In Section 2 the main technical aspects of nonstandard analysis are presented, and Robinson’s philosophy is discussed. In Section 2.1 we claim the absence of a complete and direct continuity and the only possibility of a conceptual similarity between Leibniz’s and Robinson’s theories, both at the philosophical and at the mathematical level.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Soft logic and numbers.Moshe Klein & Oded Maimon - 2016 - Latest Issue of Pragmatics Cognition 23 (3):473-484.
A Philosophical History of the Calculus.David Moore Sherry - 1982 - Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University
Leibniz, Mathematics and the Monad.Simon Duffy - 2010 - In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and The fold: a critical reader. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 89--111.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-31

Downloads
526 (#53,091)

6 months
164 (#24,052)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ivano Zanzarella
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references