Bi-facial Truth: a Case for Generalized Truth Values

Studia Logica 101 (6):1299-1318 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We explore a possibility of generalization of classical truth values by distinguishing between their ontological and epistemic aspects and combining these aspects within a joint semantical framework. The outcome is four generalized classical truth values implemented by Cartesian product of two sets of classical truth values, where each generalized value comprises both ontological and epistemic components. This allows one to define two unary twin connectives that can be called “semi-classical negations”. Each of these negations deals only with one of the above mentioned components, and they may be of use for a logical reconstruction of argumentative reasoning

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-09

Downloads
72 (#315,582)

6 months
13 (#260,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Yaroslav Shramko
Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, Ukraine
Dmitry Zaitsev
Lomonosov Moscow State University

References found in this work

Tonk, Plonk and Plink.Nuel Belnap - 1962 - Analysis 22 (6):130-134.
Reasoning with logical bilattices.Ofer Arieli & Arnon Avron - 1996 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (1):25--63.

View all 16 references / Add more references