Objectivity or Solidarity? Contemporary Discussions of Pragmatism in History

Contemporary Pragmatism 15 (2):251-270 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay critically examines contemporary discussions of pragmatism in history. First of all, as for the ‘practice before knowledge’ argument, I point out that historical inquiry cannot be properly explained by the argument whose validity is grounded in the instinct nature of practice because historical research is a contingent, intellectual behavior. About the ‘self-correcting’ argument, I maintain that historical inquiry cannot be rendered self-correcting by the pragmatic test of truth that is, in nature, future-oriented and consequentialist given that the main goal of history is to produce, not predictions or plans of action, but retrospective beliefs, which makes the mechanism of verification through action inapplicable to history. My view on the ‘disciplinary consensus’ argument is that showing how historical beliefs are produced and confirmed within the discipline does not necessarily amount to an explanation of why we should go through the whole process.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-06

Downloads
47 (#465,059)

6 months
8 (#560,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yoon Jong
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemic circularity.William P. Alston - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (1):1-30.
Essays in Experimental Logic.John Dewey - 1916 - Chicago, IL, USA: Dover Publications. Edited by D. M. Hester & R. B. Talisse.

View all 33 references / Add more references