Newcomb's paradox and Priest's principle of rational choice

Analysis 63 (3):237-242 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/63.3.237

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of Byeong-uk yi, Understanding the Many. [REVIEW]Jim Hardy - 2003 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (2).
Review of Understanding the Many, by Byeong-uk Yi. [REVIEW]Anthony Everett - 2004 - Essays in Philosophy 5 (1):142-145.
Rational Choice and Expected Utility.Reed Brannon Richter - 1985 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
Counterfactuals and newcomb's paradox.Daniel Hunter & Reed Richter - 1978 - Synthese 39 (2):249 - 261.
The lesson of Newcomb’s paradox.David H. Wolpert & Gregory Benford - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1637-1646.
Why Take Both Boxes?Jack Spencer & Ian Wells - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (1):27-48.
A Liar-Like Paradox for Rational Reflection Principles.Joshua Schechter - 2024 - Analysis 84 (2):292-300.
Newcomb’s problem isn’t a choice dilemma.Zhanglyu Li & Frank Zenker - 2021 - Synthese 199 (1-2):5125-5143.
If you're so smart why are you ignorant? Epistemic causal paradoxes.Adam Morton - 2002 - Analysis 62 (2):110-116.
Yi on 2.Joongol Kim - 2010 - Philosophia Mathematica 18 (3):329-336.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
205 (#123,280)

6 months
8 (#613,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Byeong-uk Yi
University of Toronto, Mississauga

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rational dilemmas.G. Priest - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):11-16.

Add more references