Critical Notice: Mind and Cosmos

Analysis 73 (4):801-806 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A critical assessment of Thomas Nagel's book, Mind and Cosmos, drawing out two independent notions of intelligibility, between which I argue Nagel equivocates in his central arguments.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/ant062

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Plato's Cosmic Teleology.Gábor Betegh - 2005 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 2:255-269.
Thomas Nagel: Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. [REVIEW]Logan Paul Gage - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (3):588-590.
Plausibility and Common Sense. [REVIEW]Jon Fennell - 2013 - Tradition and Discovery 40 (1):45-52.
Teleology and the Cosmos.Monte Ransome Johnson - 2005 - In Aristotle on teleology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle: Explanation and Nature.R. J. Hankinson - 1998 - In Cause and explanation in ancient Greek thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thomas Nagel. Mind and Cosmos.Józef Bremer - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 17 (2):269-273.
Mind and Life: Is the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature False?Martin Zwick - 2016 - Biological Theory 11 (1):25-38.
Nagel.Sonia Sedivy - 2009 - In Christopher Belshaw & Gary Kemp, 12 Modern Philosophers. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 134–152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-11

Downloads
935 (#25,416)

6 months
86 (#76,534)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Yates
Universidade de Lisboa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references