Decidability ofstit theory with a single agent andrefref equivalence

Studia Logica 53 (2):259 - 298 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to prove the decidability ofstit theory (a logic of seeing to it that) with a single agent andRefref Equivalence. This result is obtained through an axiomatization of the theory and a proof that it has thefinite model property. A notion ofcompanions to stit formulas is introduced and extensively used in the proof.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,211

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#349,877)

6 months
12 (#291,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ming Xu
Wuhan University

Citations of this work

Axioms for deliberative stit.Ming Xu - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (5):505-552.
On the basic logic of STIT with a single agent.Ming Xu - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):459-483.
Combinations of Stit with Ought and Know.Ming Xu - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):851-877.
Propositional q-logic.Stefan Wölfl - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (5):387-414.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Time and modality in the logic of agency.Brian F. Chellas - 1992 - Studia Logica 51 (3-4):485 - 517.
Backwards and forwards in the modal logic of agency.Nuel Belnap - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):777-807.
The way of the agent.Nuel Belnap & Michael Perloff - 1992 - Studia Logica 51 (3-4):463 - 484.

View all 6 references / Add more references