Some Critical Reflections on Berleantian Critique of Kantian Aesthetics from the Perspective of Eco-aesthetics

Espes 6 (2):30-39 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In order to develop environmental aesthetics, Berleant takes environment as an aesthetic paradigm. His understanding of the nature of environment decides the nature of his aesthetics of engagement, which emphasizes experiential continuity and rejects the separation between subject and object. Based on these ideas, he criticizes Kant’s core idea of disinterestedness in his series of books. Berleant’s environmental aesthetics has a significant impact on ecoaesthetics in China. However, Berleant’s criticism of Kant’s core idea of disinterestedness is a misunderstanding and his conception of environment is not fundamentally sound. The future of ecoaesthetics is taking ecosystem not environment as a new aesthetic paradigm.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-27

Downloads
19 (#1,080,556)

6 months
3 (#1,477,354)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Aesthetics of Environment.Arnold Berleant - 1995 - Temple University Press.
The Aesthetics of Environment.Arnold Berleant & Stephen Bourassa - 1994 - Environmental Values 3 (2):173-182.
The Aesthetics of Environment.Arnold Berleant - 1994 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (4):477-480.
Art and Engagement.Arnold BERLEANT - 1991 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 7 (1):73-76.

View all 6 references / Add more references