Minding the gap: Why there is still no theory in comparative psychology

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):152-153 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The prevailing view that there is significant cognitive continuity between humans and other animals is a result of misinterpretations of the role of evolution, combined with anthropomorphism. This combination has often resulted in an over-interpretation of data from animal experiments. Comparative psychology should do what the name indicates: study the cognitive capacities of different species empirically, without naive evolutionary presuppositions

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explaining human cognitive autapomorphies.Thomas Suddendorf - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):147-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#313,471)

6 months
12 (#287,251)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1871 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.
Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour.Kevin N. Laland & Gillian R. Brown - 2002 - Oxford University Press. Edited by Kevin N. Laland & Gillian R. Brown.
Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial.Frans B. M. de Waal - 1999 - Philosophical Topics 27 (1):255-280.

View all 6 references / Add more references