The Inseparability Thesis

Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):51-59 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several noted political theorists have argued that a state can be legitimate even if it does not generate in its citizens an obligation to obey the law. I argue that this claim is false. All plausible analyses of political legitimacy either build in the concept of political obligation, or else incorporate claims that require some account of political obligation. In either case, political legitimacy is possible only when a state successfully generates in its citizens an obligation to obey the law.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,902

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thought insertion and the inseparability thesis.Paul J. Gibbs - 2000 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 7 (3):195-202.
Morality and Political Obligation.Y. V. Satyanarayana - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:103-110.
Political Authority and Political Obligation.Stephen Perry - 2013 - In Perry Stephen R. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 2. Oxford University Press. pp. 1-74.
Morality and Political Obligation. Y. Satyanarayana - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:103-110.
Is Democracy Sufficient for Political Obligation?Kevin Walton - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 28 (2):425-442.
The Ethics of Deference: Learning From Law's Morals.Philip Soper (ed.) - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
77 (#270,445)

6 months
6 (#838,367)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references