The Nature of the ‘I Think’: Comments on Chapter 11 of Kant's Thinker

Kantian Review 19 (1):143-148 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article deals with Kant's theory of the self in Patricia Kitcher'sKant's Thinkerin three respects: (1) I argue that it is doubtful whether accompanying representations with the ‘I think’ as such yields a principle for the categories since it does not require any strong kind of connection between them. (2) I discuss textual evidence for and against Kitcher's attempt to make sense of Kant's claim that the ‘I think’ requires the continued existence of cognizersper se. (3) I ask whether Kitcher's understanding of Kant's positive theory of the self leans towards minimal substantialism or towards functionalism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,641

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
96 (#232,873)

6 months
11 (#332,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant's Transcendental Psychology.Ralf Meerbote & Patricia Kitcher - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (4):862.
...this I or He or It (The thing) which thinks..Wilfrid Sellars - 1970 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 44:5 - 31.

Add more references