Generalized urn models

Foundations of Physics 20 (7):881-903 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This heuristic article introduces a generalization of the idea of drawing colored balls from an urn so as to allow mutually incompatible experiments to be represented, thereby providing a device for thinking about quantum logic and other non-classical statistical situations in a concrete way. Such models have proven valuable in generating examples and counterexamples and in making abstract definitions in quantum logic seem more intuitive

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
28 (#792,560)

6 months
8 (#560,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Analogues of quantum complementarity in the theory of automata.K. Svozil - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (1):61-80.
Information and the complementarity game.K. Svozil - 1997 - World Futures 50 (1):523-532.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Lattice Theory.Garrett Birkhoff - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):155-157.
Realism, operationalism, and quantum mechanics.D. Foulis, C. Piron & C. Randall - 1983 - Foundations of Physics 13 (8):813-841.
General Topology.John L. Kelley - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):235-235.
The state of the pentagon. A nonclassical example.Ron Wright - 1978 - In A. R. Marlow (ed.), Mathematical foundations of quantum theory. New York: Academic Press. pp. 255--274.

View all 7 references / Add more references