Cogency and Question‐Begging: Some Reflections on McKinsey's Paradox and Putnam's Proof

Philosophical Issues 10 (1):140-163 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2010

DOI

10.1111/j.1758-2237.2000.tb00018.x

Other Versions

reprint Wright, Crispin (2000) "Cogency and Question-Begging: Some Reflections on McKinsey’s Paradox and Putnam’s Proof". Noûs 34(s1):140-163

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Proof of an external world: transmission failure, begging the question or dialectical ineffectiveness? Moore, Wright and Pryor.Annalisa Coliva - 2004 - In Annalisa Coliva & Eva Picardi (eds.), Wittgenstein Today. Il poligrafo. pp. 411--29.
Transfer of warrant, begging the question, and semantic externalism.Helen Beebee - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):356-74.
Error in Causal Efficacy.Charles A. Kimball - 1999 - Process Studies 28 (1-2):56-67.
Wright on McKinsey One More Time.Simon Dierig - 2021 - Logos and Episteme 12 (1):101-116.
Does Putnam's argument Beg the question against the skeptic? Bad news for radical skepticism.Olaf Müller - 2001 - Erkenntnis 54 (3):299-320.
Begging the Question.Heather Rivera - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.), Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 308–310.
IV*—On Putnam's Proof that We are not Brains-in-a-Vat1.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92 (1):67-94.
Question-begging and infinite regress.Henry W. Johnstone - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):291-293.
Many questions Begs the Question (but questions do not Beg the Question).Dale Jacquette - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):283-289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
959 (#22,456)

6 months
13 (#258,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What's wrong with Moore's argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
Highlights of recent epistemology.James Pryor - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):95--124.
(Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G. E. Moore and John McDowell.Crispin Wright - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):330-348.
When Transmission Fails.Chris Tucker - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (4):497-529.
Transmission Failure Failure.Nicholas Silins - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):71-102.

View all 61 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references