Style and Strategy at the Limits of Philosophy

The Monist 63 (4):494-511 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The distinction between the form and content of language, between the how and the what, is not only traditional but formative for philosophy. It is formative in that it implies their genuine separability and so authorizes focussing on one side, on the what, relegating the question of how to such ‘peripheral areas’ as rhetoric, stylistics and pragmatics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Things Are What They Are.Wallace I. Matson - 1972 - The Monist 56 (2):234-249.
What is a Question?Felix S. Cohen - 1929 - The Monist 39 (3):350-364.
What Remaineth?Willam Benjamin Smith - 1919 - The Monist 29 (1):1-31.
What is a Dogma?Edouard Le Roy - 1917 - The Monist 27 (4):481-523.
What is Intuition?Henry Jones Mulford - 1916 - The Monist 26 (2):307-312.
What Is a Relation?H. H. Williams - 1920 - The Monist 30 (1):126-129.
To Be Alive, What Is It?Edmund Montgomery - 1895 - The Monist 5 (2):166-191.
Intentionality and Epistemology.Jane Duran - 1986 - The Monist 69 (4):620-626.
What Is an Antinomy?H. H. Williams - 1923 - The Monist 33 (2):313-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
71 (#297,267)

6 months
7 (#724,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Habermas, Derrida, and the Genre Distinction between Fiction and Argument.Sergeiy Sandler - 2007 - International Studies in Philosophy 39 (4):103-119.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references