Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

A Reply to Nina Emery.Sam Mitchell - 2019 - Philosophy of Science 86 (4):794-806.
Harmless Naturalism: The Limits of Science and the Nature of Philosophy.Andrew D. Cling - 1998 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):493-495.
The limits of science'.Steven Rose - 1986 - In Steven P. R. Rose & Lisa Appignanesi, Science and beyond. New York, N.Y., USA: B. Blackwell in association with the Institute of Contemporary Arts. pp. 26--36.
Beyond the naturalistic worldview.Hyung S. Choi - 2001 - In Hyung S. Choi, David F. Siemens & Shirley E. Williams, Naturalism: its impact on science, religion and literature. Phoenix, Ariz.: Canyon Institute for Advanced Studies.
Advantages and limits of naturalism.Mario Bunge - 2009 - In John R. Shook & Paul Kurtz, The future of naturalism. Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-15

Downloads
4 (#1,833,067)

6 months
4 (#979,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references