What is the Point of Political Equality?

Philosophical Review 133 (4):367-413 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Political egalitarians hold that there is a distinct ideal of political equality, which defines and justifies democracy. So what is political equality? The orthodox view says it is equality of opportunity for political influence, not equality of political influence. The first goal of this article is to argue against this view about the nature of political equality. From 1962 to 1983, Australia’s First Nations citizens had the right to vote, but unlike other citizens they did not have the duty to vote. First Nations citizens were made politically unequal without being given any less opportunity for influence; the most plausible explanation for why they were made politically unequal is instead that they were made to exert less influence. The second goal is to use this challenge to illuminate the point of political equality. The orthodox view is typically undergirded by taking political equality to be concerned with some cosmic injustice that inheres in states of affairs, depending on the distribution of power. This is doubly mistaken. The point of political equality is deontic, not telic; and what it prescribes is not distributive, but relational. More specifically, the point of political equality is for the state to treat each citizen as an equal coauthor of the law. The overarching goal is to catalyze a more vigorous debate about political equality, akin to the long-standing debates about other dimensions of equality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Representative Democracy and Social Equality.Sean Ingham - 2021 - American Political Science Review:1-13.
Egalitarianism.Carl Knight & Andreas Albertsen - 2018 - Oxford Bibliographies in Political Science.
Democracy and equality.Steven Wall - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):416–438.
Too old to vote? A democratic analysis of age-weighted voting.Andrei Poama & Alexandru Volacu - 2023 - European Journal of Political Theory 22 (4):565-586.
Power and Equality.Daniel Viehoff - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 5:1-38.
Equality and Neutrality in Contemporary Liberalism.Michael Harry Brighouse - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Southern California
Democratic Equality and Respect.Kenneth Baynes - 2008 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 55 (117):1-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-13

Downloads
172 (#141,257)

6 months
172 (#23,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Wodak
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is the point of equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Equality and equal opportunity for welfare.Richard J. Arneson - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality.R. M. Dworkin - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (208):377-389.

View all 44 references / Add more references