The Use of Preferred Gender Pronouns

Ethics and Medics 46 (2):1-4 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some Catholic institutions have adopted policies of using persons’ preferred gender pronouns. But is this the best response? The use of preferred gender pronouns would constitute formal cooperation in a falsehood about a person because the body is an integral part of the revelation of who the person is both to himself or herself and to the other. Similarly, the principles of toleration and totality do not justify preferred pronoun usage. Pastoral care of transgender persons ought to seek to balance truth and respect of the human person in order to facilitate real friendship which leads to true healing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,026

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

He/She/They/Ze.Robin Dembroff & Daniel Wodak - 2018 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 5.
Transgender issues in Catholic health care.Edward James Furton (ed.) - 2021 - Philadelphia: National Catholic Bioethics Center.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-30

Downloads
17 (#1,234,358)

6 months
2 (#1,351,201)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Including Transgender Identities in Natural Law.Kurt Blankschaen - 2023 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 10.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references