Flexible boolean semantics. Coordination, plurality and scope in natural language

Abstract

This dissertation is based on the compositional model theoretic approach to natural language semantics that was initiated by Montague (1970) and developed by subsequent work. In this general approach, coordination and negation are treated following Keenan & Faltz (1978, 1985) using boolean algebras. As in Barwise & Cooper (1981) noun phrases uniformly denote objects in the boolean domain of generalized quanti®ers. These foundational assumptions, although elegant and minimalistic, are challenged by various phenomena of coordination, plurality and scope. The dissertation solves these problems by developing a ¯exible process of meaning composition, as ®rst proposed by Partee & Rooth (1983). Flexible interpretation involves semantic operations without any phonological counterpart, which participate in the interpretation process and change meanings of overt expressions. The dissertation introduces a novel ¯exible system where a small number of operations describe the behaviour of complex phenomena such as `non-boolean' and, the scope of inde®nites and the semantics of collectivity with quanti®cational NPs. The proposed theory is based on a distinction between two features of meanings in natural language.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Continuations and the Nature of Quantification.Chris Barker - 2000 - Natural Language Semantics 10 (3):211-242.
The Square of Opposition and Generalized Quantifiers.Duilio D'Alfonso - 2012 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 219--227.
A Single-Type Semantics for Natural Language.Kristina Liefke - 2014 - Dissertation, Tilburg University
Polymorphic Quantifiers and Underspecification in Natural Language.Chris Fox & Shalom Lappin - 2005 - In S. Artemov, H. Barringer, A. Garcez, L. Lamb & J. Woods (eds.), We Will Show Them: Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay. London: College Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
36 (#625,374)

6 months
36 (#111,579)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What do quantifier particles do?Anna Szabolcsi - 2015 - Linguistics and Philosophy 38 (2):159-204.
The scope of alternatives: indefiniteness and islands.Simon Charlow - 2020 - Linguistics and Philosophy 43 (4):427-472.
Weak speech reports.Martín Abreu Zavaleta - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (8):2139-2166.
Distributivity and Dependency.Yoad Winter - 2000 - Natural Language Semantics 8 (1):27-69.
Plural Predication and the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis.Yoad Winter - 2001 - Journal of Semantics 18 (4):333-365.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references