Were the Oxford Condemnations of 1277 Directed Against Aquinas?

New Scholasticism 48 (1):125-132 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00286621

DOI

10.5840/newscholas197448146

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The 1277 Condemnation of Kilwardby.D. E. Sharp - 1934 - New Scholasticism 8 (4):306-318.
Aquinas.John F. X. Knasas - 1983 - New Scholasticism 57 (2):196-221.
Aquinas.Joseph M. Christianson - 1988 - New Scholasticism 62 (3):249-296.
Aquinas. [REVIEW]Vernon J. Bourke - 1980 - New Scholasticism 54 (1):109-111.
Aquinas’ Justice.Robert Goodwin - 1989 - New Scholasticism 63 (3):275-285.
Action in Aquinas.Matthew Kelly - 1978 - New Scholasticism 52 (2):261-267.
Aquinas On Happiness.David W. Ardagh - 1979 - New Scholasticism 53 (4):428-459.
The Realism of Aquinas.Sandra Edwards - 1985 - New Scholasticism 59 (1):79-101.
Joyce and Aquinas. [REVIEW]Walter J. Ong - 1957 - New Scholasticism 31 (4):553-555.
Kant and Aquinas.Henry B. Veatch - 1974 - New Scholasticism 48 (1):73-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
59 (#364,759)

6 months
11 (#358,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Logic and the Condemnations of 1277.Sara L. Uckelman - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (2):201-227.
Roman Empire.Karl Ubl - 2011 - In H. Lagerlund (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer. pp. 1164--1168.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references