Why Deleuze Doesn't Blow the Actual on Virtual Priority: A Rejoinder to Jack Reynolds

Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 2 (1):97-100 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Your classic Jaguar XK 120 stands useless by the roadside. Why? Because you gave priority to the admittedly gorgeous 6 cylinder straight six engine; because you privileged the highest value part. Rubber pipes perish, though, and now thanks to a leak in a cheap hose the head gasket has blown. You are stranded and facing a costly bill. More seriously, your mechanical gaffe is a sign of your misunderstanding of Deleuze. Like Sir William Lyons, he engineers systems where the concept of priority must not be confused with independence, separateness, abstraction or ethical superiority. As a good engineer, Deleuze's constructions are holistic and opposed to abstract hierarchies: if a crucial small, actual part perishes in a particular practical situation where it has a role to play, then it does not matter how much virtual power you have in reserve. Your feet are still in a pool of hot water as you survey the wasted potential of actual motion and ideal expressions, hand made in Coventry.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-11

Downloads
52 (#424,655)

6 months
12 (#323,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Time out of Joint: Between Phenomenology and Poststructuralism.Jack Reynolds - 2010 - Parrhesia: A Critical Journal of Philosophy (9):55-64.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Wounds and Scars: Deleuze on the Time and Ethics of the Event.Jack Reynolds - 2007 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 1 (2):144-166.

Add more references