The Salem Region: Two Mindsets about Science

In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry, Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 397 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter distinguishes between two mindsets about science—the deductivist mindset and inductivist mindset—and explores the cognitive styles relating to authority and tradition in both science and pseudoscience. The deductivist tends to see problems as questions to be resolved by deduction from known theory or principle. The inductivist sees problems as questions to be resolved by discovery. Those leaning towards a deductivist mindset may find results that conflict with prior theoretical commitments unacceptable. The deductivist tends to be a cognitive conservative, and the inductivist a cognitive progressive. The conservative mindset more often leads to resentment about modernism and hence about certain scientific results.

Similar books and articles

The Salem Region: Two Mindsets about Science.John S. Wilkins - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry, Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 397.
Science rules: a historical introduction to scientific methods.Peter Achinstein (ed.) - 2004 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
The Mindset of Cognitive Science.Rick Dale - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (4):e12952.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-23

Downloads
483 (#62,330)

6 months
49 (#103,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John S. Wilkins
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references