Responsible authorship and Peer review

Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):155-174 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article the basic principles of responsible authorship and peer review are surveyed, with special emphasis on (a) guidelines for refereeing archival journal articles and proposals; and (b) how these guidelines should be taken into account at all stages of writing.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-002-0016-3

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Book Review of Assessment of Responsible Innovation: Methods and Practices. Edited by E. Yaghmaei and I. van de Poel: Routledge, London/new York, 2021, 394 p, ISBN: 9780367279752. [REVIEW]Auke Pols - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (6):1-5.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):438-438.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):102-102.
Ethical issues in communicating science.Jinnie M. Garreu & Stephanie J. Bird - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):435-442.
Convocation on scientific conduct.Stephanie J. Bird - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):91-92.
Editors' Overview: The Emergence of Ecological Ethics. [REVIEW]Ben A. Minteer, James P. Collins & Stephanie J. Bird - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):473-481.
A response: “Genes, religion and society: The developing views of the churches”. [REVIEW]Ian StJohn Fisher - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):293-295.
Introduction to the Symposium on Sabine Roeser’s Risk, Technology, and Moral Emotions.Neelke Doorn & Colleen Murphy - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):1887-1890.
Correction: Community Heroes and Sleeping Members: Interdependency of the Tenets of Energy Justice.Mandi Astola, Erik Laes, Gunter Bombaerts, Bozena Ryszawska, Magdalena Rozwadowska, Piotr Szymanski, Anja Ruess, Sophie Nyborg & Meiken Hansen - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (6):1-2.
Mary Blair-Loy and Erin A. Cech: Misconceiving Merit: Paradoxes in Excellence and Devotion in Academic Science and Engineering. [REVIEW]Andrea R. Gammon - 2023 - Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (5):1-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#377,830)

6 months
7 (#715,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science & Human Val.Jacob Bronowski - 1990 - Harper Collins.
Peer review and innovation.Raymond Spier - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):99-108.
Competency testing for reviewers and editors.Rosalyn S. Yalow - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):244-245.
Mu H ado about Peer review, part 2.Daryl E. Chubin - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):109-112.
Referees.[author unknown] - 2003 - Feminist Review 75 (1):157-157.

View all 6 references / Add more references