On a Kantian argument against abortion

Philosophical Studies 53 (1):119 - 130 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that gensler's claims (in "philosophical studies" 48:57-72 and 49:83-98) about abortion are unsound. In addition, His argument is not a kantian consistency argument as he claims, But consequentialism in disguise

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
201 (#125,020)

6 months
18 (#168,902)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Refutation by Parallel Argument.André Juthe - 2008 - Argumentation 23 (2):133–169.
Abortion and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law.Lara Denis - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):547-579.
Immanuel Kant, his philosophy and medicine.Urban Wiesing - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):221-236.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Abortion and infanticide.Michael Tooley - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1):37-65.
Abortion and the golden rule.R. M. Hare - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (3):201-222.
The Doctrine of Virtue.Immanuel Kant - 1965 - Ethics 75 (2):142-143.
A Kantian argument against abortion.Harry J. Gensler - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (1):83 - 98.
A Kantian argument against abortion.Harry J. Gensler - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (1):83 - 98.

Add more references