Did Berkeley Completely Misunderstand the Basis of the Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction in Locke?

In Colin Murray Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Univ of Minnesota Press (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Locke, Berkeley, and Corpuscular Scepticism.Daniel Garber - 1982 - In Colin Murray Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Univ of Minnesota Press.
Substance, reality, and primary qualities.Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1):1-17.
Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Distinction.Steven Nadler - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):47-61.
Berkeley and Locke.Patrick J. Connolly - 2021 - In Samuel Charles Rickless (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press.
Locke and Berkeley: a collection of critical essays.C. B. Martin (ed.) - 1968 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.
Berkeley, Perception, and Common Sense.Goerge Pappas - 1982 - In Colin Murray Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Univ of Minnesota Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-09

Downloads
13 (#1,318,048)

6 months
13 (#253,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How Berkeley's Gardener Knows his Cherry Tree.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):553-576.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references