Aesthetic Reasons, Aesthetic Value, and the Myth of the Aesthetic Meritocracy: A Reply to Erich Hatala Matthes

British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (4):577-586 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Matthes and I both hold that the central ethical harm of continuing to engage with the work of immoral artists lies in what doing so inadvertently expresses to others. (Matthes, 2021; Matthes, 2022; Willard, 2021; Willard, 2022). We also agree that there’s little wrong ethically with continuing to engage the work of immoral artists in private or within interpretive communities poised to place the ethical and the aesthetic in dialogue with each other. Matthes (2022, p. 523) notes that part of his motivation for writing the book was the countless conversations he had with friends, colleagues, and strangers about the problem of immoral artists, and my experience–—everywhere from the doctor’s office to the classroom to the bike shop—was similar. Interpretive communities reappraise immoral artists’ art together.Outside of those contexts, we both advise caution. Liao (forthcoming) suggests that doing so comes at an unrecognized cost to our aesthetic agency because the source of aesthetic value is social. In response, Matthes (2022) argues that attending to the social expression of one’s aesthetic pursuits does not compromise our aesthetic agency. This seems right. Any reasonable account of the value of aesthetic agency should presumably allow for ordinary human decency to restrain one’s public expression of one’s aesthetic loves. The proper exercise of aesthetic autonomy requires not unbridled freedom, but sensitivity to the right kinds of reasons.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Well-being of Aesthetic Beings.Sherri Irvin - 2025 - In Kathleen Galvin, Michael Musalek, Martin Poltrum & Yuriko Saito, Oxford Handbook of Mental Health and Contemporary Western Aesthetics. Oxford University Press. pp. 186-202.
Autonomy and aesthetic valuing.Nick Riggle - 2024 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (I):391-409.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-10

Downloads
34 (#698,174)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mary Beth Willard
Weber State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations