Filling a Typical Gap in a Regress Argument

Logique and Analyse 54 (216):589-–597 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I fix a typical regress argument, locate a typical gap in the argument, and try to supply a number of gap-filling readings of its first premise.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
How to Explain the Explanatory Gap.Neil Mehta - 2013 - Dialectica 67 (2):117-135.
Filling Collective Duty Gaps.Stephanie Collins - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy 114 (11):573-591.
Grounding, Analysis, and Russellian Monism.Philip Goff - 2019 - In Sam Coleman (ed.), The Knowledge Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 198-222.
On the Argument of Infinite Regress in Proving Self-awareness.King Chung Lo - 2018 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 46 (3):553-576.
On the regress argument for infinitism.John Turri - 2009 - Synthese 166 (1):157 - 163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-16

Downloads
383 (#73,817)

6 months
7 (#684,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Willem Wieland
VU University Amsterdam