Why does a causal conditional seem to assert possibility when in fact it does not?

Synthese 26 (3-4):391 - 395 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00883102

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Selfless assertions and the Knowledge Norm.Nicholas Tebben - 2020 - Synthese (12):1-20.
When Is If?M. Yoes Jr - 1995 - Sorites 1:96-99.
On some claims aboutif-then.Martin D. S. Braine - 1979 - Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):35 - 47.
One and the Possibility of Many in Greek and Indian Philosophy: Plotinus and Rāmānuja.Daniel Regnier - 2017 - Philosophy East and West 67 (3):825-840.
Racist organ donors and saving lives.T. M. Wilkinson - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (2):63–74.
Affirming the Consequent.Brett Gaul - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.), Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 42–45.
O implikacji kauzalnej.Anna Modrzejewska - 2004 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 52 (1):215-224.
Author's Response: Constructivism as Possibility?M. Füllsack - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):23-25.
Conceivability and Modal Knowledge.Albert Casullo - 2014 - In Essays on a Priori Knowledge and Justification. Oup Usa. pp. 271-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#321,009)

6 months
7 (#715,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references