A Response to John McCumber

The Owl of Minerva 17 (1):99-102 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his thoughtful review of my book Absolute Knowledge, in the Fall 1984 Owl, John McCumber identifies several potentially problematic aspects of my interpretation of Hegel’s Logic as transcendental ontology. I would like to respond to several of his objections, not polemically, but rather in order to contribute to a conversation I value. The relevant issues are: 1) dialectical necessity, 2) the specificity of the philosophy of nature, 3) the historical relativity of the system, 4) the Logic as “ground,” and 5) ontology and theology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Reply from Professor Burbidge.John Burbidge - 1983 - The Owl of Minerva 14 (4):10-11.
Response to Stephen Houlgate.John McDowell - 2009 - The Owl of Minerva 41 (1-2):27-38.
A Reply to Professor Harris.Peter C. Hodgson - 1989 - The Owl of Minerva 20 (2):252-254.
Response to John McDowell.Stephen Houlgate - 2009 - The Owl of Minerva 41 (1/2):39-51.
Discernment in the Realm of Shadows.Robert R. Williams - 1995 - The Owl of Minerva 26 (2):133-148.
Hegel’s Jena Logic and Metaphysics.H. S. Harris - 1987 - The Owl of Minerva 18 (2):209-218.
Absolute Knowledge. [REVIEW]John McCumber - 1984 - The Owl of Minerva 16 (1):83-86.
Hegel's Political Theology. [REVIEW]William Desmond - 1993 - The Owl of Minerva 24 (2):207-208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
34 (#669,621)

6 months
4 (#1,260,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

V. Alan White
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references