Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines

Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):444-446 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethical guidelines for prenatal diagnosis proposed by the World Health Organisation , as well as by national regulations, only refer to paternity and gender of the fetus as unacceptable, disease-unrelated criteria for prenatal selection, as no other such parameters are at hand so far. This perspective is too narrow because research on complex genetic systems such as cognition and ageing is about to provide clinically applicable tests for genetic constituents of potentially desirable properties such as intelligence or longevity which could be misused as parameters for prenatal diagnosis. Moreover, there is an increasing number of prenatally testable genetic traits, such as heritable deafness, which are generally regarded as pathological but desired by some prospective parents and taken into account as parameters for pro-disability selection. To protect prenatal diagnosis from ethically unacceptable genetic consumerism, guidelines must be clarified as soon as possible and updated towards a worldwide restriction of prenatal genetic testing to immediately disease-determining traits

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Embryo Selection.Bonnie Steinbock - 2002 - In Justine Burley & John Harris (eds.), A Companion to Genethics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 175–190.
Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. [REVIEW]A. C. Berry - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):130-2.
Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the 'new' eugenics.D. S. King - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):176-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
72 (#291,045)

6 months
15 (#204,260)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Selection of embryos.Anne Slowther - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (2):60-62.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Can we learn from eugenics?D. Wikler - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):183-194.
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the 'new' eugenics.D. S. King - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):176-182.
Genetic screening with the DNA chip: a new Pandora's box?W. Henn - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):200-203.

Add more references