Trust in technology: interlocking trust concepts for privacy respecting video surveillance

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 19 (4):506-520 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to defend the notion of “trust in technology” against the philosophical view that this concept is misled and unsuitable for ethical evaluation. In contrast, it is shown that “trustworthy technology” addresses a critical societal need in the digital age as it is inclusive of IT-security risks not only from a technical but also from a public layperson perspective. Design/methodology/approach From an interdisciplinary perspective between philosophy andIT-security, the authors discuss a potential instantiation of a “trustworthy information and communication technology ”: a solution for privacy respecting video surveillance. Here, strong data protection measures address grave concerns such as the threat of bulk biometric tracking of citizens. In a logical argument, however, the authors show that this technical notion of “trust” needs to be complemented by interlocking trust relations to justify public trust. Findings Based on this argument, the authors demonstrate that the philosophical position considering “trust in technology” to denote either “reliability” or “interpersonal trust” is too limited as it fails to address critical aspects of IT-security. In a broader, socio-technical sense, however, it is shown that several distinct accounts of trust – technical, interpersonal and institutional – should meaningfully interlock, to address concerns with ICTs. Originality/value This conceptual study demonstrates the potential of “trust in technology” for a more comprehensive evaluation of ICTs within the context of operation. Furthermore, it adds to the discussion of trust in IT-security by highlighting the layperson’s challenge of judging a technology’s trustworthiness. Vice versa, it contributes to Ethics of Technology by highlighting crucial IT-security needs.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Trust in the Internet of Things.Georgy Ishmaev - 2018 - In R. Leenes, R. Van Brakel, S. Gutwirth & Paul De Hert (eds.), Data Protection and Privacy: The Internet of Bodies. Hart Publishing. pp. 203-230.
Ethical EU eJustice: elusive or illusionary?Juliet Lodge - 2006 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 4 (3):131-144.
Technology and the management of trust in insurance medicine.Klasien Horstman - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):39-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-10

Downloads
919 (#23,864)

6 months
249 (#10,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sebastian Weydner-Volkmann
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

References found in this work

Trust and antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.
Trustworthiness.Karen Jones - 2012 - Ethics 123 (1):61-85.
The Cunning of Trust.Philip Pettit - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (3):202-225.
Linking Trust to Trustworthiness.Onora O’Neill - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (2):293-300.
Can we trust robots?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.

View all 10 references / Add more references