Questioning explicit properties of implicit individuals in knowledge representation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):788-789 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dienes & Perner argue that the explicit representation of an individual to which a property is attributed requires explicit representation of the attributed property. The reasons for this conclusion are similar to the reasons why another of their conclusions may be considered suspect: A property may be explicit without an explicit representation of an individual or the predication of the property to an individual. We question the latter conclusion and draw connections to neurophysiological and cognitive evidence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Individuals, properties, and the explicitness hierarchy.Alex Barber - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):756-757.
Making implicit explicit: The role of learning.Bruce D. Homer & Jason T. Ramsay - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):770-770.
Time and the implicit-explicit continuum.Jill Boucher - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):758-759.
Explicit knowledge in dolphins?Eduardo Mercado & Scott O. Murray - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):774-775.
A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge.Zoltan Dienes & Josef Perner - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):735-808.
Implicit versus explicit: An ACT-R learning perspective.Niels A. Taatgen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):785-786.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
75 (#289,479)

6 months
10 (#281,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references