A new way with the Consequence Argument, and the fixity of the laws

Analysis 63 (3):208-212 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,143

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Reply to the Consequence Argument.Matthé Scholten - 2021 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29 (2):135-158.
N.Alex Blum - 2000 - Analysis 60 (3):284-286.
The Consequence Argument and the Definition of Determinism.Christopher Hughes - 2015 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 71 (4):705-724.
Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument against Compatibilism.Grant Sterling - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone, Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 123–124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
158 (#151,863)

6 months
13 (#246,273)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Westphal
Hampshire College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Essay on Free Will.Peter van Inwagen - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophical papers.David Kellogg Lewis - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Zettel.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1967 - Oxford,: Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright.
The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism.Peter Van Inwagen - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 27 (3):185 - 199.

Add more references