Are all conversational implicatures cancellable

Analysis 66 (2):127-130 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conversational implicatures and cancellability.Steffen Borge - 2009 - Acta Analytica 24 (2):149-154.
Practical (un)cancellability.Fabrizio Macagno - 2023 - Journal of Pragmatics 215:84-95.
Can Entailments Be Implicatures?Andrei Moldovan - 2019 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical Insights Into Pragmatics. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 43-62.
Implicature, inference and cancellability.Michael Haugh - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 133-151.
Innocent implicatures.Alexander Dinges - 2015 - Journal of Pragmatics 87:54-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
208 (#121,784)

6 months
7 (#722,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matt Weiner
University of Vermont

Citations of this work

On Deniability.Alexander Dinges & Julia Zakkou - 2023 - Mind 132 (526):372-401.
Degrees of Assertability.Sam Carter - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (1):19-49.
Speaking of knowing.Patrick Rysiew - 2007 - Noûs 41 (4):627–662.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowing and asserting.Timothy Williamson - 1996 - Philosophical Review 105 (4):489-523.
Descriptive Indexicals and Indexical Descriptions.Geoffrey Nunberg - 2004 - In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 261--279.

Add more references