Welcoming Another CMD Instrument—The MES

Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (4):517-522 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This review offers a cautious acceptance ofthe Multidimensional Ethics Scale (MES) developed by Robin, Gordon, Jordan and Reiden-bach. While the contribution of the MES to future empirical research of individuals’ moral reasoning is welcomed, a number of reservations or criticisms are raised regarding theory confusion, instrument confusion, and fears arising when using the MES. I conclude that the MES is a valuable compliment to existing moral reasoning instruments - the Moral Judgment Interview and the Defining Issues Test - but not a replacement of these instruments.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Measuring Ethical Sensitivity and Evaluation.Tara J. Shawver & John T. Sennetti - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):663-678.
Ethical Decision-Making of Accounting Students.Shireenjit Johl, Beverley Jackling & Grace Wong - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 9:51-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
64 (#332,771)

6 months
19 (#155,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?