Risks associated with genetic modification: – An annotated bibliography of Peer reviewed natural science publications [Book Review]

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2):157-189 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present an annotated bibliography of peer reviewed scientific research highlighting the human health, animal welfare, and environmental risks associated with genetic modification. Risks associated with the expression of the transgenic material include concerns over resistance and non-target effects of crops expressing Bt toxins, consequences of herbicide use associated with genetically modified herbicide-tolerant plants, and transfer of gene expression from genetically modified crops through vertical and horizontal gene transfer. These risks are not connected to the technique of genetic modification as such, but would be present for any conventionally produced crops with the same heritable traits. In contrast, other risks are a direct consequence of the method used in gene manipulation. These come about because of the unstable nature of the transgene and vectors used to insert it, and because of unpredictable interactions between the transgene and the host genome. The debate over the release of genetically modified organisms is not merely a scientific one; it encompasses economics, law, ethics, and policy. Any discussion on these levels does, however, need to be informed by sound science. We hope that the scientific references provided here will provide a useful starting point for further debate

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“The moral difference between intragenic and transgenic modification of plants”.Bjørn K. Myskja - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (3):225-238.
Human Food Trial of a Transgenic Fruit.Jaci van Niekerk & Rachel Wynberg - 2017 - In Doris Schroeder, Julie Cook, François Hirsch, Solveig Fenet & Vasantha Muthuswamy (eds.), Ethics Dumping: Case Studies from North-South Research Collaborations. New York: Springer. pp. 91-98.
Genetically Modifying Livestock for Improved Welfare: A Path Forward.Adam Shriver & Emilie McConnachie - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (2):161-180.
Herbicide resistant sugar beet – what is the problem?Kathrine Hauge Madsen & Peter Sandøe - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):161-168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
112 (#191,004)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Is genetic engineering wrong, per se?J. A. Burgess & Adrian Walsh - 1998 - Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (3):393-406.
Minimizing harm in agricultural animal experiments in new zealand.M. C. Morris & S. A. Weaver - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (5):421-437.

Add more references