The Downfall of Cartesianism, 1673-1712: A Study of Epistemological Issues in Late 17th Century Cartesianism

Springer (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Phenomenalism, idealism, spiritualism, and other contemporary philo sophical movements originating in the reflective experience of the cogito witness to the immense influence of Descartes. However, Carte sianism as a complete metaphysical system in the image of that of the master collapsed early in the 18th century. A small school of brilliant Cartesians, almost all expert in the new mechanistic science, flashed like meteors upon the intellectual world of late 17th century France to win well-deserved recognition for Cartesianism. They were accompanied by a scintillating comet, Ma1ebranche, the deviant Cartesian, now remembered as the orthodox Cartesians are not. However, all these bright lights faded upon the philosophical horizon, almost as soon as they appeared. The metaphysical dualism of Des cartes was, as such, neither to be preserved nor reconstructed. There are many reasons why the Cartesian system did not survive the victory over Scholasticism which Descartes, Malebranche, and the others had won. Newtonian physics very soon replaced Cartesian physics. The practical interest and success of the new science which the Cartesians themselves had nurtured drew men down from the lofty realms of metaphysics. On the popular front, Cartesianism was attacked and ridiculed for the view that animals are unthinking machines. In the schools of Paris and elsewhere, there was the general but severe opposition of pedants, which is perhaps of more historical than philosophical interest.

Other Versions

original Watson, Richard A. (1966) "The downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712". Martinus Nijhoff

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Downfall of Cartesianism 1673-1712. [REVIEW]A. S. S. - 1967 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (3):552-552.
Descartes and Pascal.Roger Ariew - 2007 - Perspectives on Science 15 (4):397-409.
The Breakdown of Cartesian Metaphysics.Richard A. Watson - 1987 - Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Cartesian Anti-Astrology.Aaron Spink - 2020 - Lias 47 (2):175-194.
Descartes among the Scholastics.Roger Ariew - 2011 - Boston: Brill. Edited by Roger Ariew.
Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes (review).Richard A. Watson - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):415-416.
Works on Cartesians and Other 17th-Century Figures.Archives de Philosophie - 2003 - In Roger Ariew, Dennis Des Chene, Douglas Michael Jesseph, Tad M. Schmaltz & Theo Verbeek (eds.), Historical Dictionary of Descartes and Cartesian Philosophy. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. pp. 293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
8 (#1,584,551)

6 months
5 (#1,056,575)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Simon Foucher and Anti-Cartesian Skepticism.Michael W. Hickson - 2019 - In Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz & Delphine Antoine-Mahut (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 678-690.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references