The Morality of the Reptile "Pet" Trade

Journal of Animal Ethics 4 (1):74-94, (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The trade in, and private keeping of, reptiles as "pets" raises several ethical concerns regarding animal welfare (associated with handling, storage, transportation, intensive captive breeding, captivity stress, injury, disease, and high premature mortality); public health and safety (associated with zoonotic disease and animal-linked injuries); species conservation and environmental degradation (associated with wild capture); and ecological alteration (associated with invasive alien species). Also, many captive reptiles are fed other animals, raising broader ethical questions. Misperceptions about reptiles by proponents of their captivity mean that these animals are subject to conditions that would likely be considered unacceptable for dogs or cats.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

For their own good: captive cats and routine confinement.Clare Palmer & Peter Sandoe - 2014 - In Lori Gruen (ed.), The Ethics of Captivity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 135-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-22

Downloads
62 (#346,993)

6 months
5 (#1,080,408)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Neoteny Barrier: Seeking Respect for the Non-Cute.Mark J. Estren - 2012 - Journal of Animal Ethics 2 (1):6-11.

Add more references