A Miserable Argument

In Sandra Woien (ed.), Sam Harris: Critical Responses. Chicago: Carus Books. pp. 115-25 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his arguments that science itself can answer moral questions, Sam Harris often appeals to our intuitions about the badness of suffering. If we share these intuitions, Harris argues, we’ve taken a significant step in conceding to a basically utilitarian worldview. In this chapter, I critically assess Harris’ arguments and find them deeply wanting.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

My Life Gives the Moral Landscape its Relief.Marc Champagne - 2023 - In Sandra Woien (ed.), Sam Harris: Critical Responses. Chicago: Carus Books. pp. 17–38.
Sam Harris: Critical Responses.Sandra Woien (ed.) - 2023 - Chicago: Carus Books.
A Libertarian Response to Dennett and Harris on Free Will.John Lemos - 2017 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8 (3):231-246.
Book Review: Sam Harris' The Moral Landscape. [REVIEW]Russell Blackford - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (2):53-62.
Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris.John Haydn Gurmin - 2016 - Maynooth Philosophical Papers 8:30-44.
Cognitive Empathy in the Works of Sam Harris.Evgeniy Bubnov - 2019 - Dialogue and Universalism 29 (2):109-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-20

Downloads
845 (#26,796)

6 months
196 (#15,562)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Warren
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references