Why law — efficacy, freedom, or fidelity?

Law and Philosophy 13 (3):259 - 284 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Quong, Patten, Miller and Waldron.Cécile Laborde - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (1):105-118.
The Soviet Union did not have a legal system.Kees Quist & Wouter Veraart - 2009 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 38 (1):37-49.
Thoughtfulness and the Rule of Law.Jeremy Waldron - 2023 - Harvard University Press.
Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends.Wil Waluchow - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 18 (2):207-247.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
102 (#213,682)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Lon Fuller and the moral value of the rule of law.Colleen Murphy - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.
Legal Hypocrisy.Ekow N. Yankah - 2019 - Ratio Juris 32 (1):2-20.
Natural law as professional ethics: A reading of Fuller.David Luban - 2001 - Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (1):176-205.
The rule of law: beyond contestedness.Paul Burgess - 2017 - Jurisprudence 8 (3):480-500.
¿Fue auschwitz legal? Legalidad, exterminio Y positivisimo jurídico.Antonio Peña Freire - 2016 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 45:11-46.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references