Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint

New York: Cambridge University Press (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are liberalism and perfectionism compatible? In this study Steven Wall presents and defends a perfectionist account of political morality that takes issue with many currently fashionable liberal ideas but retains the strong liberal commitment to the ideal of personal autonomy. He begins by critically discussing the most influential version of anti-perfectionist liberalism, examining the main arguments that have been offered in its defence. He then clarifies the ideal of personal autonomy, presents an account of its value and shows that a strong commitment to personal autonomy is fully compatible with an endorsement of perfectionist political action designed to promote valuable pursuits and discourage base ones.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
140 (#159,571)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Wall
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

Egalitarianism and Moral Bioenhancement.Robert Sparrow - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):20-28.
Autonomy in moral and political philosophy.John Christman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Neutrality, Cultural Literacy, and Arts Funding.Jack Alexander Hume - 2024 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 10 (55):1588-1617.
Framing Effects Do Not Undermine Consent.Samuel Director - 2024 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 27 (2):221-235.
Public Reason.Jonathan Quong - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 44 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references